AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > HIPAA

Medical Privacy

Related Resources

This page contains documents in Portable Document Format (PDF). The Adobe Acrobat® Reader® is required to view PDF documents. Download Acrobat® Reader®.

Also on Government Affairs

AAMC Documents

Background: Privacy

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which became law on August 21, 1996, authorized the Secretary of HHS to promulgate regulations on standards for the privacy of individually identifiable health information if Congress did not enact health care privacy legislation by August 21, 1999. HIPAA also required the Secretary of HHS to provide Congress with recommendations for protecting the confidentiality of health care information. The Secretary submitted recommendations to Congress on September 11, 1997.

As Congress did not enact legislation regarding the privacy of individually identifiable health information prior to August 21, 1999, HHS published a proposed Rule setting forth such standards on November 3, 1999. The Department received more than 52,000 public comments in response to the proposal. After reviewing and considering the public comments, HHS issued a final Rule on December 28, 2000, establishing “Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information.”

After publication of the final privacy rule, HHS received many inquiries and unsolicited comments through telephone calls, e-mails, letters, and other contacts about the impact and operation of the privacy rule on numerous sectors of the health care industry. Many of these commenters exhibited substantial confusion over how the privacy rule will operate; others expressed great concern over the complexity of the privacy rule. In response to these communications and to ensure that the provisions of the privacy rule would protect patients' privacy without creating unanticipated consequences that might harm patients' access to health care or quality of health care, the Secretary of HHS requested comment on the privacy rule in March 2001. After an expedited review of the comments by the Department, the Secretary decided that it was appropriate for the privacy rule to become effective on April 14, 2001, as scheduled.

HHS issued “the first in a series of guidance materials,” which “explains and clarifies key provisions” of the rule on July 6, 2001. The guidance addressed a number of issues, including consent, the “minimum necessary” standard, oral communications, business associates, parents and minors, health-related communications and marketing, research, restrictions on government access to health information, and payment. HHS anticipated “there will be many questions that will arise on an ongoing basis” that will need to be answered in future guidance. In addition, HHS stated it would issue proposed modifications to the rule as necessary to address problems arising from unintended effects of the Privacy Rule on health care delivery and access.

On August 14, 2001, the AAMC joined with 14 other organizations in a letter to Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson indicating concern that the final HHS rule, “unless substantially amended, will harm patients and scientific innovation by creating significant obstacles to the conduct of biomedical, epidemiologic, health services, and other research.”

Jennifer Kulynych, J.D., Ph.D., director in the AAMC's Division of Biomedical and Health Sciences Research, testified August 21, 2001, before the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics' Subcommittee on Privacy and Confidentiality - an advisory body to the Secretary of Health and Human Services – on the association's objections to certain provisions in the final rule. Dr. Kulynych stated that while the AAMC strongly supports measures to protect the privacy rights of research participants, it believes that some of the standards outlined in the HIPAA rule would constrict researchers' access to essential medical information, creating significant obstacles to the conduct of research. A primary concern with the rule is its imposition of civil and criminal liability upon hospitals, health plans, and providers who use or disclose data for research purposes, even when such actions have been approved by institutional review boards.

The AAMC joined nearly 200 research universities, medical schools, teaching and community hospitals, medical specialty and scientific societies, and other associations in a November 20, 2001, letter to Secretary Thompson requesting that the department re-open rulemaking for the "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information." Citing "the growing consensus within our community that the rule must be amended to avoid the harm that will result when covered entities and research companies in private industry begin their implementation efforts," the letter states, "[T]he rule's restrictions on the use and disclosure of protected health information for research purposes, and limits on the retention of research data, will seriously impair our ability to conduct clinical trials, clinico-pathological studies of the natural history and therapeutic responsiveness of disease, epidemiologic and health outcome studies, and genetic research."

On February 11, 2002, the AAMC asked the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to examine the rule's research provisions closely. "Problems [pertaining to the medical privacy rule] of regulatory burden, redundancy, ambiguity, workability . . . are all matters of concern for regulatory policy that fall within the OMB's expertise and purview," wrote AAMC President Jordan Cohen, M.D.

In a February 7, 2002 letter to Secretary Thompson, Senators Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), ranking Republicans on the full Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions and the Public Health Subcommittee, respectively, support modifications to the new federal medical-privacy rule, specifically addressing concerns for the rule's potentially deleterious impact on medical research and innovation in health care.

Representatives Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) and Nancy Johnson (R-Conn.), chairs of the full House Ways and Means Committee and the Health Subcommittee, respectively, wrote a letter on February 26, 2002 to Secretary Thompson and OMB Director Mitch Daniels calling on the Administration to address research-related issues before any final medical privacy rule is published.

In response to ongoing concerns expressed by a number of organizations, including the AAMC, on March 27, 2002, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights published a proposed rule to modify portions of the privacy regulations mandated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Public Law 104-91. The proposal was issued with a 30-day comment period that expired on April 26, 2002. In a statement issued April 4, 2002, the AAMC strongly endorsed the proposed changes while noting “additional progress is needed if the privacy rule is to become a truly workable standard that does not unduly impair patient care and research. AAMC Memorandum #02-13 summarizes the major modifications and clarifications being proposed as well as the AAMC’s continued concerns with the de-identification standard and the fund raising provisions as well the rule’s burdensome accounting requirements. AAMC also has prepared a draft comment letter.

On August 14, the Department of Health and Human Services published final modifications to the Medical Privacy Rule, based on the more than 11,000 public comments received on the March 27 notice of proposed rulemaking. The Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information (the Privacy Rule) took effect on April 14, 2001. The Privacy Rule creates national standards to protect individuals' personal health information and gives patients increased access to their medical records. As required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), the Privacy Rule covers health plans, health care clearinghouses, and those health care providers who conduct certain financial and administrative transactions electronically. The privacy rule regulates how these "covered entities" may use and disclose identifiable health information for routine (e.g., treatment, payment) and non-routine (e.g., research, marketing) purposes. Most covered entities must comply with the Privacy Rule by April 14, 2003. Small health plans have until April 14, 2004 to comply with the Rule.

Background: Transaction Standard

The HIPAA statute required the Secretary of HHS to adopt standards from among those already approved by private standards developing organizations for certain electronic health transactions, including claims, enrollment, eligibility, payment and coordination of benefits. A final rule was published in the Federal Register on August 17, 2000. On December 27, 2001, President Bush signed a law that delays the compliance date for one year to October 16, 2003. A covered entity will not receive the extension unless it submits a compliance plan to HHS by October 15, 2002. The CMS web site has a form can be completed and submitted to fulfill this requirement.

Background: Security Standard

HHS also was required by HIPAA to promulgate standards for the security of individual health information and electronic signature use by health plans, health care clearinghouses, and health care providers. A rule was proposed on August 12, 1998. It has not yet been made final.

Contact Us    © 1995-2009 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement